India Distances Itself as SCO Condemns Israeli Strikes on Iran

In a significant diplomatic move, India chose to distance itself from a collective Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) condemnation of Israel’s strikes on Iran, reflecting its independent and pragmatic approach to growing tensions in the region.

Amid the tensions, EAM S Jaishankar spoke to his Israeli and Iranian counterparts in Friday. (AFP) | Hindustan Times

What the SCO Said

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation — a group that includes China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, and several Central Asian states — strongly condemned Israel’s attacks on Iran, stating that these strikes violate international law and undermine peace and stability. The group called for dialogue and diplomatic resolution, emphasizing the danger the conflict poses to the entire region’s stability.

India's Distancing From The Condemnation

While the rest of the SCO came together to criticize Israel’s actions, India chose a different path. The Ministry of External Affairs made it clear that it did not participate in the discussions that resulted in the collective statement. According to the ministry, India's longstanding policy focuses on diplomatic dialogue, de-escalation, and peace, without aligning itself against either side in the conflict.

This diplomatic approach reflects India's careful balance in preserving its relationships with both Iran — a key player in energy and connectivity — and Israel, a major defense and strategic ally.

Diplomatic Engagements At The Highest Level

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar engaged directly with his Iranian and Israeli counterparts following the escalation of conflict. His messages stressed India's deep concern for civilian safety and the growing humanitarian crisis. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Modi spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, emphasizing the need for de-escalation and a return to dialogue.

Such diplomatic exchanges highlight India's role as a responsible actor, choosing diplomacy over conflict, and preserving its ability to act as a peace intermediary if needed.

Rising Tensions And Global Impact

The ongoing conflict has raised alarm across the international community. Iran’s attacks, which resulted in civilian casualties and significant structural damage, drew a strong response from Israel, fueling worries about a larger escalation. This volatility had a ripple effect on financial markets, with energy stocks experiencing a downturn and investors growing nervous about growing geopolitical uncertainty.

Some European governments, alongside Middle Eastern stakeholders, have called for de-escalation and for both Iran and Israel to pursue diplomatic negotiations instead of further aggression.

Conclusion

India’s decision to distance itself from the collective SCO condemnation underscores its pragmatic, independent, and diplomatic approach to growing conflict in the Middle East. At a time when many are choosing to align their statements with growing tensions, India's policy reflects its understanding that peace cannot be enforced through blame — but through dialogue, engagement, and careful diplomacy.

(Sources: Hindustan Times, Mint)