Centre Slams Bhagwant Mann for Mocking PM Modi’s Foreign Tours: A Growing Rift Over Diplomacy

Political Storm Over PM Modi’s Diplomatic Visits

In early July 2025, Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann sparked a political controversy with his remarks targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s international visits. Mann ridiculed the PM’s itinerary, which included visits to countries such as Ghana, Trinidad & Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia, sarcastically referring to fictional nations like “Magnesia,” “Galveaisa,” and “Tarvesia.” He highlighted that some of these countries have very small populations, around 10,000 people, and questioned the relevance of these visits, juxtaposing them with India’s vast population of 140 crore. Mann also pointed out that Modiji often receives high civilian honours abroad but has not held a press conference in 11 years, implying a lack of domestic engagement.

Punjab Chief Minister and AAP leader Bhagwant Mann on Thursday took a jibe at PM Modi's recent foreign visits | India Today

His comments were seen as a critique not just of the diplomatic tours themselves, but also of the Prime Minister’s perceived distance from pressing internal issues. Mann’s sardonic tone suggested that Modi prioritized international recognition over addressing the needs and concerns of Indian citizens.

Ministry of External Affairs Responds Firmly

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) quickly issued a stern response, condemning the remarks as “irresponsible and regrettable.” Without explicitly naming Mann, the MEA described the comments as unbecoming of a state leader and warned that such rhetoric risks damaging India’s relationships with friendly nations, especially those in the Global South. The MEA emphasized that foreign policy and diplomatic engagements are solely within the purview of the central government.

MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal underlined that the government distances itself from statements that undermine India’s diplomatic ties and reiterated the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in public discourse concerning international relations.

Bhagwant Mann’s Defiant Stand

Despite the MEA’s criticism, Bhagwant Mann stood by his statements. He asserted that it is within the rights of state leaders and citizens alike to question the Modiji’s foreign visits and their significance. Mann challenged the Centre’s rebuke by framing his comments as a call for transparency and accountability in government spending and diplomatic priorities.

He further cited instances from the past, including Modiji’s unexpected landing in Pakistan in 2015, to question the strategic value and intent behind some of the Prime Minister’s international engagements. Mann implied that while some diplomatic visits might garner global headlines, critical domestic issues such as Punjab’s water disputes remain unresolved.

Underlying Political Dynamics

This clash between the Centre and Punjab’s state leadership reflects broader political and ideological tensions. Mann, who has a background in comedy and activism, has often taken a populist approach, using humor and pointed critiques to question the policies of the ruling party at the Centre.

His comments tap into a wider narrative among opposition voices, which express skepticism about the frequency and priorities of the Modiji’s foreign tours. They argue that while global diplomacy is important, it should not overshadow urgent domestic concerns.

On the other hand, the central government views these diplomatic missions as crucial for strengthening India’s geopolitical standing, especially with emerging economies and resource-rich countries across Africa and Latin America. Engagements such as the BRICS summit and bilateral visits are seen as avenues to secure strategic partnerships and economic opportunities for India.

Conclusion: Navigating Diplomacy and Domestic Expectations

The ongoing exchange between Bhagwant Mann and the Centre underscores the delicate balance between foreign policy pursuits and addressing internal governance. While diplomatic outreach is essential for India’s global aspirations, the criticism from state leaders signals a demand for greater transparency and alignment with the country’s domestic priorities.

As Mann vows to continue questioning the Modiji’s foreign tours, the political discourse is likely to remain charged. The challenge lies in managing constructive debate without compromising India’s international image or internal cohesion. Ultimately, the episode highlights how diplomacy and domestic politics are deeply intertwined in shaping the nation’s future.

(Sources: India Today, Hindustan Times, OpIndia)