top of page

Amit Shah’s Infiltration Pitch Sets the Tone for Bengal’s 2026 Political Battle

As West Bengal steadily moves towards the 2026 Assembly elections, the political temperature in the state has begun to rise sharply. Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s recent visit to Kolkata marked a decisive moment in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign, with illegal infiltration emerging as a central theme. Shah’s remarks were not merely electoral rhetoric; they were positioned as a warning and a promise, aimed at redefining governance, security, and political accountability in the state.


During his interactions with the media, Shah asserted that if the BJP forms the next government in West Bengal, its foremost task would be to put an end to illegal infiltration and remove those who have entered the state unlawfully. By placing this issue at the forefront, the BJP has signalled that the Bengal elections will be fought as much on questions of national security and border control as on local governance.


Amit Shah at a press conference in Bengal on Tuesday (Photo: Partha Paul) | Indian Express
Amit Shah at a press conference in Bengal on Tuesday (Photo: Partha Paul) | Indian Express

Infiltration as a National Security Question

Shah framed infiltration not as an isolated administrative failure but as a matter of national concern. West Bengal shares a long and sensitive border with Bangladesh, making border management a complex challenge. According to Shah, unchecked illegal entry has consequences that go beyond demographics, affecting internal security, electoral integrity, and social cohesion.


He questioned why other border states have been more successful in curbing illegal immigration, implying that political will, rather than geography alone, plays a decisive role. The Home Minister also raised concerns about delays in border fencing and alleged lack of cooperation from the state government, suggesting that these issues have contributed to the persistence of the problem.


A Direct Attack on the Trinamool Congress

The BJP’s campaign has drawn a sharp contrast between its own claims of decisive governance and what it describes as the Trinamool Congress’s failures. Shah accused the Mamata Banerjee-led government of turning a blind eye to infiltration for political considerations. He linked the issue to a broader narrative of misgovernance, alleging that corruption, lawlessness, and administrative decay have flourished under the TMC’s long rule.


Beyond infiltration, Shah highlighted multiple corruption scandals that have dominated headlines in recent years, arguing that they reflect systemic rot rather than isolated incidents. He also raised concerns about public safety, particularly for women, portraying the current administration as incapable of ensuring basic law and order.


The TMC’s Rebuttal and the Federal Question

The Trinamool Congress has firmly rejected the BJP’s allegations, calling them politically motivated and misleading. TMC leaders have pointed out that border security and immigration control fall under the jurisdiction of the central government, primarily through agencies like the Border Security Force. From their perspective, any failure to prevent infiltration cannot be laid solely at the state government’s doorstep.


Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has accused the BJP of using fear-based narratives to polarise voters and distract from pressing local issues such as employment, welfare delivery, and economic stability. The TMC continues to project itself as a defender of Bengal’s identity and federal rights, positioning the BJP’s campaign as an imposition driven by central power.


Electoral Strategy and Political Calculations

For the BJP, the infiltration narrative serves multiple strategic purposes. It consolidates its national security credentials, appeals to voters concerned about demographic change, and shifts the election discourse away from purely state-level governance issues. The party believes that its growing organisational strength since 2016 has prepared it for a serious challenge to the TMC’s dominance.


For the ruling party, the challenge lies in countering this narrative without appearing dismissive of genuine security concerns. The TMC’s strategy appears focused on emphasising development schemes, welfare programmes, and regional pride, while questioning the BJP’s record on economic issues and social harmony.


The MGMM Outlook

As West Bengal heads toward the 2026 Assembly elections, Amit Shah’s focus on illegal infiltration has pushed border security to the centre of the political debate. By framing infiltration as a national security threat rather than a routine administrative lapse, the BJP has sought to redefine the Bengal contest around questions of sovereignty, electoral integrity, and governance. The emphasis on West Bengal’s porous border with Bangladesh, delays in fencing, and alleged political reluctance to act has been used to argue that unchecked infiltration affects social stability and democratic processes, not just demographics.


The sharp contrast drawn between the BJP and the Trinamool Congress underscores a deeper battle over accountability and political will. While the TMC attributes infiltration failures to the Centre and accuses the BJP of fear-mongering, the BJP links the issue to broader claims of misgovernance, corruption, and declining law and order under the state government. With national security, federal responsibility, and governance now intertwined, the infiltration debate has become a defining lens through which voters are being asked to judge Bengal’s political future.



bottom of page