top of page

Adani, LIC, and the Washington Post Allegations: Separating Fact from Political Narrative

The Storm Around India’s Business Giant

India’s Adani Group has once again found itself at the center of global controversy. In October 2025, The Washington Post published an explosive report alleging that Indian government agencies, including the Department of Financial Services (DFS), NITI Aayog, and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), had jointly crafted a plan to funnel nearly $3.9 billion (around ₹33,000 crore) of LIC’s funds into Adani Group companies. The alleged plan, the report claimed, was designed to restore investor confidence in Adani’s businesses, which had been struggling after a series of U.S. bribery and fraud allegations.


The story ignited immediate debate in India’s political and financial circles. Opposition parties accused the government of using the savings of millions of LIC policyholders to rescue a politically connected conglomerate. Meanwhile, LIC, the Adani Group, and the Modi government categorically denied the report, calling it “false and baseless.”


Adani, a close ally of Modi, faced no pushback from his government or party when accused of "pulling the largest con in corporate history" by Hindenburg Research last year. Photo: Hindustan Times | The Business Standard
Adani, a close ally of Modi, faced no pushback from his government or party when accused of "pulling the largest con in corporate history" by Hindenburg Research last year. Photo: Hindustan Times | The Business Standard

The U.S. Allegations Against Adani Group

The controversy began months earlier when the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed charges against Adani Group entities and executives. The charges accused the conglomerate of bribing Indian government officials to secure lucrative solar power contracts and of misleading investors about its anti-corruption practices.


According to U.S. filings, between 2021 and 2024, Adani executives allegedly funneled more than $265 million in bribes to officials in states like Andhra Pradesh to win energy projects. The case, dubbed “The Corrupt Solar Project,” claimed that the group violated U.S. securities laws by concealing these illicit payments while raising capital from international investors.


The revelations sent Adani’s stock prices tumbling and raised doubts about governance practices within one of India’s most influential business empires. Adani Group, however, dismissed the allegations as “malicious and politically motivated,” asserting that it fully complies with all laws in every jurisdiction.


The Alleged LIC ‘Roadmap’

Just as the U.S. case unsettled investor confidence, The Washington Post report suggested a deeper connection between the Indian state and the conglomerate. Citing internal documents and unnamed officials, the newspaper claimed that a secret “roadmap” was drafted in May 2025 by India’s financial policymakers to direct LIC—India’s largest insurer—to invest billions into Adani Group firms.


The plan reportedly outlined how LIC would buy Adani corporate bonds and expand its equity holdings in Adani entities, including Adani Ports and Adani Green Energy. The goal, according to the report, was to “signal confidence” to domestic and international markets that India’s biggest institutional investor still trusted the Adani Group despite the U.S. indictments.


Such an endorsement, the report implied, could help stabilize the conglomerate’s finances and encourage other investors to return. If true, it would amount to a state-backed bailout using public funds — a charge that the opposition immediately seized upon.


Political Reactions and Public Outcry

India’s opposition parties, led by the Congress, accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government of crony capitalism and misusing the hard-earned savings of LIC’s 30 crore policyholders. They demanded a parliamentary investigation into the alleged government-orchestrated rescue plan.


Congress leaders claimed the report exposed the nexus between big business and the state, arguing that the Modi administration was protecting its favored industrialist even in the face of international corruption charges. Hashtags such as #AdaniLICScam and #CronyCapitalism trended on Indian social media, reflecting the growing public unease.


LIC’s Firm Denial

The Life Insurance Corporation of India quickly moved to contain the controversy. In an official statement, LIC said “no such document or plan as alleged has ever been prepared by LIC.” The insurer emphasized that all its investments were made “independently, in accordance with board-approved policies and after detailed due diligence.”


LIC also clarified that the Department of Financial Services and other government agencies had no role in its investment decisions. The organization called The Washington Post report “false, baseless, and far from truth.”


Former LIC chairman Siddhartha Mohanty also defended the corporation, calling the claims “misleading” and asserting that LIC’s investment portfolio had always been managed with utmost integrity and autonomy.


Adani Group’s Response

The Adani Group issued a statement dismissing any claim of preferential treatment. It reiterated that LIC’s investments were made as part of its normal financial strategy, not under political pressure.


The company pointed out that LIC has investments in numerous Indian conglomerates, and isolating its Adani holdings was an unfair distortion. Adani Group stressed that its growth story was built over decades—long before Narendra Modi became Prime Minister—and that linking its fortunes solely to political proximity was “an oversimplified narrative lacking factual basis.”


Where Does Modiji Fit In?

While critics have long accused the Adani Group of enjoying special access to the Modi administration, the Washington Post report does not directly implicate Prime Minister Modiji or his office in the alleged LIC plan.


The documents cited by the report refer to bureaucratic agencies — not the Prime Minister’s Office — and provide no evidence that Modiji himself ordered or endorsed the plan. Both the Indian government and the Ministry of External Affairs have stated that the U.S. case is a private legal matter between Adani Group and American regulators, not a reflection of India’s governance.


To date, there has been no public evidence connecting Modiji personally to the LIC investments or to any alleged bailout effort.


The Larger Implications

Even without direct proof of wrongdoing, the episode has stirred a broader debate on the relationship between India’s political establishment and its industrial giants. Critics argue that the perception of favoritism undermines public trust in institutions like LIC, which manage billions in citizens’ savings.


The allegations also raise questions about the autonomy of state-owned financial bodies and whether their investment choices can truly remain independent of political influence.


For the Modi government, the challenge lies in demonstrating transparency and dispelling the perception of crony capitalism — especially as India seeks to position itself as a global investment destination.


The MGMM Outlook

The Washington Post report alleging that Indian agencies and LIC planned a $3.9 billion investment “rescue” for the Adani Group has triggered political uproar more than proven misconduct. While U.S. regulators have raised charges of bribery against Adani entities, both the company and Indian authorities have firmly rejected these claims as politically motivated. The report itself presents no concrete evidence, yet opposition parties in India seized upon it to question the government and create public distrust. This episode reflects how international media narratives can quickly evolve into political tools, often framing India’s business growth through a skeptical Western lens rather than verified facts.


In reality, neither LIC nor Adani has been found guilty of wrongdoing, and no document or directive links the government to the alleged plan. Both institutions maintain that their investment decisions are made transparently and independently. The controversy, therefore, seems more like a clash of perception than a case of corruption. It highlights the need for responsible journalism and fact-based reporting, especially when global outlets discuss India’s economic giants. Rather than weakening confidence, such unfounded allegations only reaffirm the resilience of India’s financial institutions and the maturity of its regulatory ecosystem.


Sources:


Comments

bottom of page